When interference from Church rose to unbearable levels for corrupt British politicians hampering loot of their treasury, brand new doctrine of ‘Secularism’ was dished out to separate totalitarian and despotic Churchinity from their politics. ‘Multi-religious’ society, ‘multiculturism’, ‘free-thinking’ etc. were high-sounding terms that started floating around to impart a semblance of sanctity to the newly born theological species of ‘secularism’. Through the miasma of secularism, corrupt British politicians thwarted prying eyes of the clergy from their nefarious activities by insisting on separation between executive and Church.
The last Mughal Jawaharlal Nehru suddenly discovered secularism as an effective instrument with which to denigrate Hindu identity of the nation, promote Islam and pamper Muslims with ‘Kafir’ taxes collected from innocent Hindu-s toiling day and night to run the nation and feed a community that hardly contributed to prosperity of the nation. The so-called great visionary had authored ‘Discovery Of India’ (there might have been a ghost author behind his name) but failed to discover that entire diversity from Kashmir to Kanyakumari and Kucchha to Kamrup is intimately interwoven through the institution of Hinduism alone excluding Abrahamic faiths that were invaders, did not belong to the nation at all. Nehru smartly hid his profound love for Islam and utter contempt for Hinduism behind the veil of secularism, multiculturalism, diversity and plurality. However occasionally he was brazen enough to utter that explicitly as he did while inaugurating Ramakrshna Mission Institute, Kolkata in 1961, “I have always avoided using the word spirituality because of the existence of much bogus spirituality. India is a hungry nation. To talk of spirituality to hungry men does not mean anything…It is no good running away from the daily problems of life in the name of spirituality. I am out of place in this gathering…I am supposed to open this building and inaugurate the conference. I do so.”
Abrahamic invaders had intruded the nation with the sole mission to plunder wealth, destroy Hinduism and perpetuate their doctrine of colonialism. First the world felicitated us as ‘Vishva-Guru’, accepted Hinduism as the most ancient, fundamental and mother of all other faiths, liberally bought our goods then suddenly turned invaders and colonialists. By the dint of secularism, multiculturalism, pluralism and universalism, invading Abrahamic cults were sought to be regularised in the country as indigenously planted and grown to obliterate fundamental identity of the nation as a Hindu-Rashtra. Sanatana Dharma was stridently derogated with terms like ‘polytheism’, ‘idol-worship’ and followers as ‘idolaters’, ‘heathens’, ‘Kafirs’ etc. Anti-Hindu propaganda had been so strident that it has been a profound embarrassment to be a Hindu in this supposedly Hindu-Rashtra. Those who had been historically fascists with blood of crores of human beings dripping from their hands, declared Hindu-s as fascists who in reality had been one of the worst persecuted victims in the history of humanity. Secularism was established as a buzzword for ‘modernism’ and ‘liberalism’. We also witnessed a similar phenomenon in our neighbourhood when despotic Communist China invaded and captured Tibet, tortured and slaughtered scores of Tibetan monks, went on a destruction spree of Buddhist culture, then declared Tibetan Buddhists as ‘Fascists’ !!!
Russian KGB infiltrated all wings of the nation under the tutelage of Nehru itself, aggravated under Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi regimes. Both Abrahamic cults have always been in cahoots with Communism in an anti-Hindu alliance and their influence over Governments peaked during Indira Gandhi regime so much so that they succeeded in luring Prime Minister LB Shastri to Tashkent for negotiations and murdered him there. Nehruvian anti-Hindu secularism assumed ludicrous dimensions when Nehru rushed to Bihar to threaten Hindu-s of bombing who were on rampage in response to Jinnas ‘Direct Action Day’ on Aug. 16, 1946 which led to a terrible Hindu-genocide. However he had refrained from interfering in Calcutta killings as ‘law and order’ was a state subject albeit it was not so in case of Bihar !! Even in case of Ajmer riots, Nehru did not allow Sardar Patel to act and intervened through his Secretary HVR Iyengar to ensure Muslims were in good humour and instructed him to arrest equal number of Hindu-s to maintain pro-Muslim communal harmony though as usual, Muslims were the real butchers as in the case of Calcutta killings. Being a sworn enemy of Hindu-s, the last Mughal Nehru was gracious enough to allow infiltration of East Pakistani Muslims into Bengal and Assam in the name of secularism. Also he liberally allowed Christian missionaries to go on rampage of proselytization of poor and innocent Hindu-s transforming North-East into a hotbed of insurgency and secessionism.
Quite enigmatically, Nehru had no qualms or misgivings over secularism when it came to votes to win power. He too, never hesitated in manipulating Abrahamic heads in the country to vote Congress to majority in legislature. And he invariably succeeded because Hindu-s have been too naïve to comprehend his devious means to grab power, never evolved into a Hindu vote bank. On the contrary, Muslims and Christians invariably accorded supreme importance to religious vote-bank politics and bullied Governments in power to extract substantial concessions for their respective communities. Absence of Hindu-lobby also prodded the last Mughal to ignore Uniform Civil Code mandated to be laid down in Directive Principles of the Constitution as he understood vote-bank value of Islamic clergy and their influence over Muslims. Interim Government led by the last Mughal Jawaharlal Nehru piloted an Object Resolution on Dec. 13, 1946 to appease Muslim League to prevent them from pressurizing for partition. The Objective Resolution miserably failed, Partition-1947 was carried out, lakhs were massacred but discussion on the Objective Resolution continued, spilled over into the Constituent Assembly and finally adopted as Articles 29 and 30 of the Constitution. These two articles are blatantly anti-Hindu/pro-Muslim and betrayed pathological, visceral anti-Hindu hatred of Nehru so conspicuously before the nation. Veteran Congress leader DP Mishra said, “…and so far as Nehru was concerned, he had apparently expected secularism to be practised only by the Hindus.” Ultimately, Nehru gifted the nation Articles 29 and 30 instead of the mandated Uniform Civil Code in the name of secularism. We earnestly hope BJP regime headed by Prime Minister Modi shall be able to undo all those anti-Hindu Constitutional provisos to restore primacy of Sanatana Dharma in the country.