Modern day gliteratti/chataratti/secular-intelligent Johns and Janes have often criticised Guru Dronacarya of having demanded right thumb from Eklavya as Gurudaksina though the Guru did not teach him directly and Eklavya had learned entire martial archery on his own endeavour. Even a Delhi High Court Judge with heavy secular leanings too, had commented adversely on the Guru in full court and accused him of being a racist as Guru Dronacarya was a Brhmana and Eklavya, a tribal from Nisada community !!!! Quite ironically, the judge happened to be a so-called Kashmiri-Pandit, cow-flesh eater and grandson of a former Union Home Minister of Nehru Cabinet !! I wish I could ask the Judge in full court, “Was racism even known at that time in that society ?” My take on the subject is quite radical and realistic.
The Guru strictly, I repeat strictly followed ordinances of Manusmriti wherein a person with excessive Tamasika Guna opts to serve all other three Varna-s and not go for learning martial-/higher-education. If Eklavya had not been carrying with him an excessive baggage of Tamasika Guna, Guru Dronacarya might not have declined him that education…then he would have been receiving the education that Arjuna received from him, then he would have been probably rubbing his shoulders with those princes in that Gurukula with a Siddha Yogi that Guru Dronacarya was, as his Guru too, irrespective of his tribal family background. Now another question raises its head, if Eklavya was loaded with Tamasika Guna then why he was so determined to learn archery on his own, then why he was denied the skill by Guru Dronacarya after he attained that.
If Eklavya had not been carrying on with the legacy of Tamasika Guna from his previous lives, he would not have been born in a tribal clan at all !! At the time of birth, resurgent Guna decisively selects family/clan to be born to so as to be in the appropriate ambience/surroundings conducive to facilitate redemption of the resurgent Guna. That is the inviolable cosmic law enshrined in Sruti and perceived real by several Siddha Yogi-s. So vehement a desire to gain knowledge of archery of the highest order (which he did not require as a hunter-tribal dwelling in jungles) was tainted by his Tamasika Guna which the Siddha Purusa in Guru Dronacarya instantly perceived. To prevent any eventual mis-application of the skill with criminal or undesirable intent detrimental to society, the Guru nipped the possibility in bud by demanding his right thumb as Gurudaksina so as to disable him forever.
Alongwith martial education, Guru-s always imparted Samskara-s too with equal or may be more emphasis, on that. Eklavya learned the sophisticated skill of archery obstinately without striving to attain those Samskara-s which teach restraint and several other virtues too, alongwith it which Arjuna possessed amply well. Why did Eklavya accept Dronacarya as his Guru when he was resolutely declined earlier ? Guru Dronacarya was left with no other option except to nip those diabolical possibilities immediately by demanding Eklavya, his right thumb. It was a highly professional/objective decision in that era.
Another version from Mahabharata is purported to have been entirely different. The Guru only demanded inviolable commitment as Guru-Daksina from Eklavya to the effect that he would not participate in any battle between Pandava-s and Kaurava-s whatsoever in future which he had foreseen given the intensity of fratricidal acrimony and dubious conduct of Dhrtarastra. To this Eklavya is purported to have exclaimed in despair, “It amounts to severing my right thumb.” And the distorted legend was allowed to survive and flourish, Guru Dronacarya had demanded his right thumb in physical form and not Thumb-commitment in reality. Secondly, the Guru was retained by the royal clan on insistence of Bhisma to coach royal siblings and it imposed certain injunctions on him that did not allow him to accept anyone else as his disciple. He did not ask his Varna before declining him his discipleship. Guru had not imparted that education even to his own son Ashvatthama hence, he cannot be accused of being caste-biased or discriminatory. Even the Suta-Putra Karna was his disciple before he deviously switched over to Guru Parasurama. Moreover, Eklavya belonged to hostile Jarasandha camp, son of Army Chief of Magadh Kingdom who did not enjoy cordial relations with Kuru-s of Indraprastha, had invaded Dvarika later and killed in battle with Vasudeva Sri Krsna. He was not even alive during Mahabharata war.
I hope, pseudo-intellectuals and pseudo-secularists will stop maligning Guru Dronacarya of possessing a racist bent of mind.
Discussion about this post