Why only 33 crore gods for Hindus? Why not more!

In social media of Facebook and Twitter, I am frequently ridiculed and berated for my faith of Sanatana Dharma that is purported to boast 33 crore devis and devas to worship. They also condemn Hindus worshipping plants and animals too. Those ‘they’ happen to be mostly Roman Catholics of Goa, Protestants of Nort-East Bharata, ‘Khalistani’ brand Sikhs from Canada and a motley crowd of ISI brain-washed Sikhs residing in Jammu. When countered and challenged, they issue me warnings / threats of dire consequences which I thoroughly enjoy and laugh at, following foot-steps of my hero Russy Karanjia, late editor of a weekly tabloid Blitz which used to be published from Bombay. I am dismayed to behold, Sikhs do not wish to accept the reality that Sikhism is one of so many streams emerging from the Gangotri  of Sanatana Hinduism  and Sikhs have been Rajputas in the erstwhile scheme of Varna  order. Catholics/Protestants/Muslims do not wish to accept that their faith does not belong to this nation and those were forcibly imposed upon their ancestors by intruders from overseas.

There have been others too, who are ‘lambasted’ like that which many of them meekly ignore / tolerate, some explain away by saying that it is 33 only and not 33 crore, that ‘Koti’ does not necessarily mean ‘crore’ etc. Let me now set the records straight for the benefit of all who may be seeking accurate perception of the imbroglio even at the risk of being condemned further.

We are well aware that Absolute Entity is binomial in structure and likewise, all sub-entities too, are binomial in configuration. Chetana  i.e. Consciousness and Jada  i.e. material together create an absolute entity, also adored as Param Brahmatma. Param Chetana, also known as Samasti Chetana  i.e. Absolute Consciousness of Param Brahmatma  allows Himself to manifest/proliferate into innumerable individualised Cetana-s, circumscribed by Ahamkara, also known as Vyasti-Cetana  as well as Atma. In a parallel and compatible cosmic event, Jada too manifests / proliferates into innumerable entities through the processes of aggregation and conglomeration, all absolutely devoid of Chetana  at the behest of Param Cetana. Jivatma comes into being ONLY when Vyasti-Chetana associates itself with Jada. It is also known as embodiment or birth and it’s converse, dis-embodiment or demise.

In Sanatana Dharma, it is Chethana who is worshipped, whether Param Chetana  of Param Brahmatma  or Vyasti-Chetana  of a living being who may be an ant or elephant. Every manifestation of Chetana  is adorable irrespective of contours imparted upon by various conglomerated derivatives of Jada. Every Vyasti-Chetana possesses the potential to attain absolute divinity. Quite logically, there are innumerable Vyasti-Chetana-s i.e. Atmas who are already Devas or poised to evolve into Devas.

Thus Sanatana Dharma  has infinite number of devis/devas to be adored and worshipped, not merely 33 crores as grossly misunderstood or misinterpreted by some. So there is no dearth of devis and devas to choose from for worshipping as each and every Vyasti Chetana  is adorable and deserves to be worshipped. Concepts and realities like Vasudhaiva Kutumbakum, Ahimsa etc. spontaneously spring forth as soon as you concede, every Atma is an adorable celestial Deva. Philosophy behind Sanatana Hindu greeting in the form of ‘namaste’ too, is based on that axiomatic truth alone.

When a Hindu worships a plant or an animal, it is Vyasti-Chetana hidden within the plant or animal as the case may be, is worshipped and not body of the plant or animal in question. It naturally implies, it is Cetana that worships Chetana  with the means of Jada. So cynics, sceptics, atheists, hedonists, nihilists, sensualists and of course, secular-lunatics have absolutely no business to ridicule Sanatana way of worshipping some plants and animals.

When a Hindu  worships a Murti  carved out of Jada  viz. stone, wood, glass, soil etc., it is Vyasti-Cetana  ensconced within the Murti  after Vedic  ritual of Prana-Pratistha  is solemnised, is worshipped and NOT the idol crafted of Jada  material. Hence, Murti-Puja  cannot be accurately translated into or described as Idol-worship as Murti  is not an idol at all. Murti  is a repository of divine Cetana  whose Prana-Pratistha  has been solemnised through invocations, a manifestation of the Deva  or Devi  for whom the sacrosanct Vedic  ritual of Prana-Pratistha  has been carried out. All those individuals, empires, Kingdoms have been razed to dust that destroyed such a Murti / Mandira  or under whose regime, such instances of desecration has / had been enacted. Desecration of Cetana inevitably invites terrible consequences to bear with.

Tailanga Swami Maharaja, a Siddha Yogi  and contemporary of Swami Ramakrishna Paramhamsa  who came from Andhra Pradesh, settled down on banks of Ganga  at Varanasi, lived for almost 270 years, prayed to the small Murti  of Ma Kali  whom he used to worship, to appear before him and his disciple to bless both of them. Ma Kali  did emerge from the Murti  after his invocations manifesting Herself as a young girl, blessed both and reverted into the same Murti. In this exceedingly mysterious nation, such events are quite frequent, neither rare nor exceptional albeit accessible only to those who are imbued with Sraddha and Bhakti unto Him or Her.

Hence as a matter of fact, those who ridicule Sanatana Hinduism for having 33 crore Devas / Devis to choose from and worship, are in reality, laughing at their own abject ignorance about an intense  adhyatmika  mysticism as ancient as the Planet Earth itself.

Notice: Undefined variable: vuukle in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/free-comments-for-wordpress-vuukle/includes/commentbox.php on line 21

Notice: Trying to get property 'settings' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/free-comments-for-wordpress-vuukle/includes/commentbox.php on line 21

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/free-comments-for-wordpress-vuukle/includes/commentbox.php on line 21